2025年2月11日，星期二，第1176期

在AI层面，中国为世界构建“第二选择”

【媒体报道】

2月11日，法国总统马克龙在巴黎人工智能行动峰会宣布，未来几年法国将在人工智能领域投资 1090 亿欧元（1125 亿美元），因为欧洲正寻求在这个由美国和中国主导的快速增长的行业中占据更大的一席之地。“这对法国来说相当于美国宣布的星际之门。”马克龙说。

【讨论纪要】

●中国显然在AI层面为世界构建出“第二选择”

2月9日，尽管DeepSeek创始人梁文峰因安全顾虑，决定不亲自前往巴黎参加人工智能行动峰会（通过虚拟现实技术，在线上参会），但这次在巴黎举行的人工智能行动峰会无疑成为当前国际局势发展的焦点之一。中国通过“DeepSeek效应”（“DeepSeek+华为”模式）不仅严重冲击了特朗普政府基于AI层面施行“合纵连横，远交进攻”，更让此时此刻的欧洲如同印度那样，在“玩转AI”的问题上信心爆棚！

不久前，法国总统马克龙坦承，欧洲在当今全球AI竞赛之中严重落后，甚至已不在“竞赛行列”。当今世界，在AI层面，能够平起平坐的只有中、美两家。而在此前，包括欧洲在内的全世界，除了美国，没有其他选择，以至于欧洲从未想过能够在AI竞赛中脱颖而出并成为独立一极。马克龙深知，美国不会允许。

随着中国独立自主研发软、硬件系统全面突破美国封锁，尤其以DeepSeek横空出世打破美国AI技术垄断与霸权后，中国显然在AI层面为世界构建出“第二选择”，这使得欧洲有可能克服美国的遏制和封杀，在AI竞赛中脱颖而出并成为独立一极。这对于欧洲而言，绝对是一件非常令人感到兴奋的事情。

●DeepSeek的出现，并非孤立的偶然事件

DeepSeek的成功，让人们看到了中国汉字和古文化对现代AI技术及应用快速发展起到的超乎人们想象的重要作用。现在，全球都在学习DeepSeek和中文，包括OpenAI、微软、苹果、英伟达等。

DeepSeek是开源的，其与AI技术垄断和霸权是天敌。这意味着任何人都可以用，都可以改，类似Linux。当然，随着各方的深入参与，其与DeepSeek之间的关系也会更为紧密。值得一提的是，DeepSeek灌注了浓厚的“中华传统文化基因”（这些是西方人无法把握的，也是“香蕉人”最终无法把握的，他们的思维模式因从小受到西方文化，比如，极端利己主义、殖民文化等的深刻影响，已经完全改变），“香蕉人”恐怕很难发明类似DeepSeek这样的事物，无法把握好日后维护、改善和提升DeepSeek的精髓所在。所以，本质上，我们并不害怕DeepSeek开源。

AI技术及应用以及相关软硬件系统虽属技术层面，但欧洲或会首先以此为切入点，在中美之间寻求某种平衡。这本身就破解了特朗普政府基于AI竞争层面欲开展的“合纵连横，远交进攻”。而且这种破解明显已经投射到以政治、安全为代表的传统安全层面和以经济、金融为代表的非传统安全层面。甚至在我们的观察与评估中，DeepSeek的出现与中国连续曝光两款新型战机密切相关的，并非孤立的偶然事件。

在我们看来，恐怕马斯克早已将“DeepSeek+华为”模式视为其最大死敌。中国的AI技术及应用如果说是“虚实结合，务实（实体经济）为主”的话，“特朗普们”之“马斯克们”的AI技术及应用就是“虚实结合，务虚（虚拟经济）为主”。无法落地变现和创造真实的财富是其主要弊端。所以，中国的AI技术及应用是“特朗普们”之“马斯克们”羡慕的，更是恐惧的。

需要补充的是，马斯克调查美联储这件事也许我们能从中有所启发。大家知道，中国的央行制度是学习西方的（本质是国务院下属金融机构，美联储是私人机构，我们改得更多是形式，而马斯克要得更多是内容），是有问题的，所以，由“马斯克废掉美联储”这个话题引申出来，也许未来某个合适的时候，中国也会对现有央行制度做相应变革。这个话题，我们也将在随后更合适的时候与大家展开讨论（东方时事解读多年前强调这个问题很重大，尤其是马斯克要毁掉美联储的今天，但始终机会不到）。

●海湾阿拉伯国家已经做出了选择，“无冕之王”已经出现

我们注意到，在巴黎人工智能行动峰会召开前夕，法国总统马克龙宣布，未来几年将在人工智能领域投资1090亿欧元。主要来自阿拉伯联合酋长国在法国建设人工智能园区的投入以及美国、加拿大的大型投资基金和法国企业的投资等。

值得一提的是，法国总统马克龙将这一融资项目与美国的“星际之门”项目相提并论。有趣的是，1月24日，美国总统特朗普在达沃斯论坛的讲话中提到沙特阿拉伯王储穆罕默德·本·萨勒曼承诺将与美国的投资和贸易额扩大6000亿美元（有消息称，特朗普希望沙特王储的投资继续加码，表示将向沙特王储施压，将该金额提升至1万亿美元）。如果我们把以沙特为首的海湾阿拉伯国家看作是一个整体，显然，海湾阿拉伯国家在巴黎人工智能行动峰会召开前夕就已经开始“分散投资”。而明眼人都清楚，欧洲人之所以在美国技术霸权和垄断下有信心将其与“星际之门”计划相提并论，有希望“玩转AI”并成为“世界一级”，全赖中国基于AI层面为世界提供的“第二选择”，且美国无力阻止。所以，某种意义上说，与其说海湾阿拉伯国家的“分散投资”方向是欧洲，还不如说是中国。在这个问题上，中国再次成为“无冕之王”。

海湾阿拉伯国家已经做出了选择。“无冕之王”已经出现。如果欧洲和俄罗斯的态度进一步明朗，那就等同于他们和海湾阿拉伯国家一样，将代表未来的AI技术及应用的“宝”押向中国，这令美国感到非常恐惧，甚至无差别的通过“关税大棒”对其最主要盟友之一的欧盟（“老欧洲”）施压，但问题是，“大人，时代变了”——曾因捆绑销售问题在过去 20 年里累计被欧盟罚款22亿欧元的微软或将面临欧盟更严厉的制裁，根据规定，欧盟反垄断罚款最高可达微软全球年收入的10%！显然，欧洲人“依葫芦画瓢”，对美国技术垄断和霸权进行反击。对此，大家是否有一种感觉，此前被西方打断的，主要基于传统安全层面的“第四轮排列组合”似乎借AI的土壤，在非传统安全层面被“再度唤醒”。

●这场惨烈博弈的参与者都是华尔街，都在玩高科技，都是“宁可生命死亡，也不想生意死亡”，唯一的区别是……

此外，美国内部“恶斗”不断，特朗普政府无暇他顾也是欧盟（“老欧洲”）敢于对美国科技垄断和霸权进行反击的主要原因，而与欧盟有类似心思的方方面面恐怕大有人在：俄罗斯、以色列、沙特、阿联酋、伊朗等都会这样想。其中，海湾阿拉伯国家先行一步——沙特刚刚承诺五年内向美国投资6000亿美元，结果阿联酋就先向欧洲（中国）“分散投资”了1100亿欧元。

未来，大家不妨密切关注美国内部“恶斗”深化过程中出现的反弹现象，比如，马斯克是否会成为“美国版主父偃”，DOGE成为“美国版冲锋队”，特朗普成为“第二个肯尼迪”等。某种意义上说，这场惨烈博弈的参与者都是华尔街，都在玩高科技，都是“宁可生命死亡，也不想生意死亡”。

唯一的区别在于，一部分是保守势力，而另一部分是新兴势力，所以，他们之间的矛盾具体表现出来就是生死搏杀，互不相让。值得一提的是，除了美国财政部、美联储的“秘密账目”中藏有一部“百官行述”，乌克兰总统泽连斯基手里也有一部“百官行述”（泽连斯坦言，美国援助乌克兰的大约2100亿美元大约乌克兰只收到了三分之一）。当然，泽连斯手中的是“对外账本”，美国财政部、美联储手中的是“对内账本”（类似《李卫当官》中的“论语记账”）。

●中东地区有朝一日彻底变天，美帝影响力被逐出中东，以色列国家利益有出路，但对特朗普政府，美国国家利益则是灭顶之灾

2月10日，法国总统马克龙公开谈及了他对美欧贸易战的看法，指出目前美欧面临着俄乌冲突、中东问题以及中美竞争等挑战，关税问题不是当务之急，他强调欧盟是美国的盟友而非首要的问题，美国真正的首要问题应该是中国。除此之外，马克龙还宣称，如果美方想让欧洲参与更多的投资、安全和防务，就不应该用关税威胁来伤害欧洲经济。

在法国总统马克龙将巴黎AI行动峰会与“星际之门”项目相提并论后，国际社会瞄着欧美关系大玩尊王攘夷已经取得了初步成效，至少，美国最大的盟友——欧盟，在AI层面，将成为美国的一个强力竞争对手。

2月10日，中国常驻联合国代表团网站发布傅聪大使在安理会反恐问题公开会上的发言。傅聪大使称，当前，恐怖主义呈上升态势，国际社会面临的恐怖威胁依然复杂严峻。安理会要继续把反恐放在议程的优先位置，坚持对恐怖主义“零容忍”，反对“双重标准”和选择性反恐，推动加强国际反恐合作。我们支持1267委员会监测小组继续关注和分析全球恐怖形势，为安理会工作和会员国提供参考。

傅聪大使着重强调，日前，叙利亚向外国恐怖作战分子授予高级职位，其中包括安理会列名的恐怖组织“突厥伊斯兰党”也就是“东伊运”的头目，中方对此表示严重关切。

在国际社会瞄着欧美关系大玩尊王攘夷已经取得了初步成效后，对于欧盟（“老欧洲”）而言，就算基于传统安全层面的乌克兰问题，叙利亚问题，恐怕也要争一争。

既然马克龙总统在打给叙利亚临时政府领导人的电话中提到了库尔德人问题，既然中方对叙利亚向外国恐怖作战分子授予高级职位，其中包括安理会列名的恐怖组织“突厥伊斯兰党”也就是“东伊运”的头目深表关切，那么大家不妨一起努力，先把“恐怖主义”“恐怖组织”和“恐怖分子”的定义权从美国人手里拿过来，如果局面真的向这一方向发展，那么，距离美国的影响力被从中东地区挤出去还有多远？如果特朗普政府无法控制中东地区，以色列内塔尼亚胡小集团恐怕不会答应，美国国内特朗普急切希望获得支持的“绝对少数”也许不但不会帮特朗普，甚至会落井下石。某种意义上说，中东地区有朝一日彻底变天，美帝影响力被逐出中东，以色列国家利益有出路，但对特朗普政府，美国国家利益则是灭顶之灾。

至少在目前阶段，“老欧洲”完全可以用此为筹码和美国讨价还价，中国愿意向“老欧洲”提供战略策应。如果特朗普将这种前景称为“中国借欧洲（北约）这把刀，把美帝‘凌迟处死’（突出这是一个相对缓慢的过程）”，恐怕也不为过。

最后需要补充的是，某种意义上说，由于欧洲心心念念想要求得一条从中东经土耳其进入欧洲且摆脱美国控制的能源通道，对于坐拥两个“能源海峡”：一个是土耳其海峡（物理上），一个是叙利亚（形式上）的土耳其来说，欧洲利益背后就是土耳其利益，而中国对“老欧洲”的战略策应，也就等同于战略策应了土耳其。当然，对以沙特为主的海湾阿拉伯国家而言，更是战略策应，甚至未来会链接伊朗和“中、吉、乌铁路”，但这会让急于巩固政权的内塔尼亚胡政府而言压力很大——包括海湾阿拉伯国家在内的中东国家恐怕会更愿意靠近有中国做强大战略策应的欧盟（“老欧洲”）和土耳其，与此同时不断削弱美以在中东的影响力。此时此刻，以色列国家利益恐怕就到了必须做出重新选择的时候。而在西方资本利益的复杂转进问题上，对于从代言西方资本利益的美国资本利益分离出来的“拜登们”之“索罗斯们”以及“盖茨们”等，也到了必须做出最后选择的时候。在这个“已经变了味儿”的“西方资本利益复杂转进”进程很可能会“脱稿运行”，甚至变得“面目全非”，其中，有的接受“基因改造”融入“一带一路”，而有的则被湮灭于历史长河之中。

声明：具体内容如有出入，请以“东方时事解读”音频为准。

Tuesday, February 11, 2025, Issue No. 1176

China Offers the World a "Second Option" in AI

[Media Coverage]

On February 11th, French President Emmanuel Macron announced at the AI for Humanity Summit in Paris that France will invest 109 billion euros (112.5 billion USD) in the field of artificial intelligence over the coming years, as Europe seeks to carve out a larger share in this rapidly growing industry dominated by the United States and China. "This is France's equivalent of America's Stargate announcement," Macron said.

【Discussion Summary】

● China is Clearly Building a "Second Option" in AI for the World

On February 9th, although DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng decided not to attend the AI for Humanity Summit in Paris in person due to security concerns (instead participating online through virtual reality technology), the summit held in Paris undoubtedly became one of the focal points of current international developments. Through the "DeepSeek Effect" ("DeepSeek + Huawei" model), China has not only severely impacted the Trump administration's AI-based strategy of "forming alliances and dividing enemies, making distant friends and launching offensives," but has also boosted Europe's confidence, much like India, in "mastering AI"!

Not long ago, French President Emmanuel Macron admitted that Europe is severely lagging behind in the global AI race and is not even "in the running." In today's world, only China and the United States can stand on equal footing in AI. Previously, the world, including Europe, had no other choice besides the United States, and Europe never imagined that it could excel in the AI race and become an independent pole. Macron is well aware that the United States would not allow it.

With China's independent research and development of software and hardware systems breaking through US blockades in an all-round way, especially with the emergence of DeepSeek, which has broken the US monopoly and hegemony in AI technology, China has clearly built a "second option" in AI for the world. This makes it possible for Europe to overcome US containment and suppression, excel in the AI race, and become an independent pole. This is absolutely an exciting prospect for Europe.

● The Emergence of DeepSeek is Not an Isolated Coincidence

The success of DeepSeek has shown people the unexpectedly significant role that Chinese characters and ancient culture play in the rapid development of modern AI technology and applications. Now, the world is learning from DeepSeek and Chinese, including OpenAI, Microsoft, Apple, NVIDIA, and others.

DeepSeek is open-source, and it is the natural enemy of AI technology monopolies and hegemony. This means that anyone can use it and modify it, similar to Linux. Of course, as various parties become more deeply involved, their relationship with DeepSeek will also become closer. It's worth mentioning that DeepSeek is infused with a strong "gene of Chinese traditional culture" (which Westerners and "banana people" can ultimately not grasp. Their thought patterns have been completely changed by the profound influence of Western culture, such as extreme individualism and colonial culture since childhood). It is unlikely that "banana people" could invent something like DeepSeek or grasp the essence of maintaining, improving, and enhancing DeepSeek in the future. Therefore, essentially, we are not afraid of DeepSeek being open-source.

Although AI technology, applications, and related hardware and software systems belong to the technical realm, Europe may use this as an entry point to seek some sort of balance between China and the United States. This, in itself, disrupts the "alliance-building and diplomatic offensive" strategy that the Trump administration sought to implement based on AI competition. Moreover, this disruption has clearly extended to traditional security aspects represented by politics and security, as well as non-traditional security aspects represented by economics and finance. In our observation and assessment, the emergence of DeepSeek is closely related to China's consecutive unveiling of two new fighter jets, and is not an isolated coincidence.

In our view, it is likely that Musk has long regarded the "DeepSeek + Huawei" model as his greatest nemesis. If China's AI technology and applications can be described as "combining the virtual and real, with a focus on practicality (the real economy)," then the AI technology and applications of the "Trumps" and "Musks" are "combining the virtual and real, with a focus on abstraction (the virtual economy)." Their main drawback is the inability to be implemented, monetized, and create real wealth. Therefore, China's AI technology and applications are both envied and feared by the "Trumps" and "Musks."

It should be added that we can perhaps draw inspiration from Musk's investigation into the Federal Reserve. As we all know, China's central banking system is modeled after Western systems (essentially a financial institution under the State Council, whereas the Federal Reserve is a private institution; we have made more changes in form, while Musk seeks more changes in substance), and there are issues with it. Therefore, extending from the topic of "Musk abolishing the Federal Reserve," perhaps at some appropriate time in the future, China will also make corresponding reforms to its existing central banking system. We will discuss this topic with you at a more appropriate time in the future (Eastern Current Affairs has emphasized the significance of this issue for many years, especially now that Musk wants to destroy the Federal Reserve, but the opportunity has not yet arisen).

● The Gulf Arab states have made their choice, and the "uncrowned king" has emerged.

We have noticed that on the eve of the AI for Humanity Summit in Paris, French President Emmanuel Macron announced an investment of 109 billion euros in the field of artificial intelligence over the coming years. This investment mainly comes from the construction of an AI park in France by the United Arab Emirates, as well as large investment funds from the United States and Canada, and investments from French companies.

It is worth mentioning that French President Emmanuel Macron compared this financing project to the US "Stargate" project. Interestingly, on January 24th, US President Donald Trump mentioned in his speech at the Davos Forum that Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman pledged to increase investment and trade with the United States by 600 billion dollars (it was reported that Trump hoped for even more investment from the Saudi Crown Prince and indicated that he would pressure him to increase the amount to 1 trillion dollars). If we consider the Gulf Arab states, led by Saudi Arabia, as a whole, it is clear that they have already begun to "diversify their investments" on the eve of the AI for Humanity Summit in Paris. And it is obvious to all that the reason Europeans have the confidence to compare their plan with the "Stargate" project and aspire to "master AI" and become a "world-class player" despite the US technological hegemony and monopoly, is entirely due to the "second option" that China has provided to the world based on AI, which the US is powerless to stop. Therefore, in a sense, it would be more accurate to say that the direction of the Gulf Arab states' "diversified investments" is towards China, rather than Europe. On this issue, China has once again emerged as the "uncrowned king".

The Gulf Arab states have made their choice, and the "uncrowned king" has emerged. If Europe and Russia further clarify their positions, it would be equivalent to them, like the Gulf Arab states, placing their bets on China for the future of AI technology and applications. This terrifies the United States, to the point where it is even using the "tariff stick" indiscriminately against the EU ("Old Europe"), one of its closest allies. But the problem is, "times have changed" – Microsoft, which has been fined 2.2 billion euros by the EU over the past 20 years for bundling sales, may face even harsher sanctions from the EU. According to regulations, the maximum anti-monopoly fine that the EU can impose on Microsoft is up to 10% of its global annual revenue! Clearly, the Europeans are "following suit" and fighting back against US technological monopoly and hegemony. Do we all have a feeling that the "fourth round of realignment," which was previously interrupted by the West and was mainly based on traditional security, seems to have been "reawakened" in the realm of non-traditional security through the soil of AI?

● The participants in this brutal game are all from Wall Street, all playing high-tech, all believing "better to let life perish than let business die," with the only difference being...

Moreover, the continuous internal "struggle" within the United States, leaving the Trump administration with little time to focus on other matters, is the main reason why the EU ("Old Europe") dares to counterattack against U.S. technological monopoly and hegemony. And there are probably many others who share similar thoughts with the EU, including Russia, Israel, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Iran, and so on. Among them, the Gulf Arab states have taken the lead - Saudi Arabia just pledged to invest $600 billion in the United States over five years, but the UAE has already "diversified its investments" by investing €110 billion in Europe (and China).

In the future, everyone might as well pay close attention to the rebound phenomena that emerge as the internal "struggle" in the United States deepens, such as whether Musk will become the "American version of Zhu Fuyan," DOGE becoming the "American version of the Stormtroopers," and Trump becoming the "second Kennedy." In a sense, the participants in this brutal game are all from Wall Street, all playing high-tech, all believing "better to let life perish than let business die."

The only difference is that some are conservative forces, while others are emerging forces. Therefore, their conflicts manifest specifically as a life-and-death struggle, with neither side giving in. It's worth mentioning that in addition to the "secret accounts" of the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve hiding a "record of officials' conduct," Ukrainian President Zelenskyy also has a "record of officials' conduct" (Zelenskyy admitted that Ukraine has only received about one-third of the approximately $210 billion in U.S. aid to Ukraine). Of course, the one in Zelenskyy's hands is the "external ledger," while the one in the hands of the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve is the "internal ledger" (similar to the "Analects accounting" in "Li Wei Becomes an Officer").

● If the Middle East undergoes a complete transformation one day, and U.S. influence is expelled from the region, Israel's national interests may find a way out, but for the Trump administration, U.S. national interests would suffer a catastrophic blow.

On February 10th, French President Emmanuel Macron publicly discussed his views on the U.S.-EU trade war, pointing out that the U.S. and EU are currently facing challenges such as the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the Middle East issue, and competition between China and the U.S. The tariff issue is not a top priority, he emphasized, stating that the EU is an ally of the U.S. rather than a primary problem, and that the U.S.'s true top priority should be China. In addition, Macron declared that if the U.S. wants Europe to participate more in investment, security, and defense, it should not harm the European economy with tariff threats.

After French President Macron compared the Paris AI Action Summit to the "Stargate" project, the international community's efforts to respect the king and resist the barbarians in terms of U.S.-Europe relations have achieved initial results. At the very least, the EU, the U.S.'s largest ally, will become a strong competitor for the U.S. in the field of AI.

On February 10th, the website of China's Permanent Mission to the United Nations released Ambassador Fu Cong's speech at the open meeting of the Security Council on counter-terrorism issues. Ambassador Fu stated that terrorism is on the rise, and the terrorist threats faced by the international community remain complex and severe. The Security Council must continue to prioritize counter-terrorism on its agenda, adhere to a "zero-tolerance" approach towards terrorism, oppose "double standards" and selective counter-terrorism, and promote strengthened international cooperation in counter-terrorism. We support the 1267 Committee's Monitoring Team in continuing to pay attention to and analyze the global terrorist situation, providing references for the work of the Security Council and member states.

Ambassador Fu emphasized that Syria has recently granted senior positions to foreign terrorist fighters, including the leader of the terrorist organization "Turkistan Islamic Party," also known as the "East Turkestan Islamic Movement," which is listed by the Security Council. China expresses serious concern about this.

After the international community's efforts to respect the king and resist the barbarians in terms of U.S.-Europe relations have achieved initial results, for the EU ("Old Europe"), even issues such as Ukraine and Syria, which are based on traditional security, may be worth contesting.

Since President Macron mentioned the Kurdish issue in his phone call with the leader of the Syrian interim government, and since China is deeply concerned about Syria granting senior positions to foreign terrorist fighters, including the leader of the terrorist organization "Turkistan Islamic Party," also known as the "East Turkestan Islamic Movement," listed by the Security Council, everyone might as well work together to first take the definition power of "terrorism," "terrorist organizations," and "terrorists" away from the Americans. If the situation really develops in this direction, how far are we from seeing U.S. influence being expelled from the Middle East? If the Trump administration cannot control the Middle East, the small group led by Netanyahu in Israel may not agree, and the "absolute minority" in the U.S. that Trump desperately hopes to gain support from may not only fail to help Trump but may even kick him while he's down. In a sense, if the Middle East undergoes a complete transformation one day, and U.S. influence is expelled from the region, Israel's national interests may find a way out, but for the Trump administration, U.S. national interests would suffer a catastrophic blow.

At least at this stage, "Old Europe" can use this as a bargaining chip to negotiate with the U.S., and China is willing to provide strategic support to "Old Europe." If Trump refers to this prospect as "China using the knife of Europe (NATO) to slowly execute the U.S. emperor by slicing" (emphasizing that this is a relatively slow process), it would not be an exaggeration.

Finally, it should be added that, in a sense, because Europe is eager to find an energy corridor from the Middle East through Turkey to Europe that is free from U.S. control, for Turkey, which sits on two "energy straits": one is the Turkish Strait (physically) and the other is Syria (formally), European interests are intertwined with Turkish interests. Therefore, China's strategic support for "Old Europe" is also equivalent to strategic support for Turkey. Of course, for Gulf Arab countries, especially Saudi Arabia, it is even more strategic support, and may even link up with Iran and the "China-Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan railway" in the future. However, this will put a lot of pressure on the Netanyahu government, which is eager to consolidate its power - Middle Eastern countries, including Gulf Arab countries, may be more willing to align themselves with the EU ("Old Europe") and Turkey, which have strong strategic support from China, while continuously weakening U.S.-Israel influence in the Middle East. At this moment, Israel's national interests may be at a time when they must make a new choice. And on the issue of the complex shift in Western capital interests, for the "Soros," "Gates," and others who have separated from U.S. capital interests representing Western capital interests, such as the "Bidens," it is also time to make a final choice. In this "complex shift in Western capital interests" process, which has "changed its flavor," it is likely to "go off script" and even become "unrecognizable." Some may undergo "genetic modification" to integrate into the "Belt and Road," while others may be annihilated in the course of history.

Disclaimer: In case of any discrepancies in the specific content, please refer to the 'Eastern Current Affairs Interpretation Audio' for the most accurate information.

原文作者公众号：

广州市贯日翻译服务有限公司为东方时评-衍射传媒/衍射咨询提供翻译支持

翻译请联系http://www.en-ch.com/chcontact.htm

手机微信13924166640

广州市越秀区环市东路世界贸易中心大厦南塔24楼 020-86266990