2025年2月12日，星期三，第1177期

马斯克第17次修改遗嘱设定“只要消失72小时就公布星链源代码”等应对措施，究竟是在对谁发出强烈警告？

【媒体报道】

2月12日，马斯克第17次修改遗嘱。马斯克透露称，只要他消失72小时，预先设定的AI系统就会将星链源代码全网公开。

2月12日，为期两天的人工智能行动峰会于2月11日在法国巴黎落下帷幕。闭幕当天，法国、中国、印度等61个签署方签署了巴黎人工智能宣言，共同发布《关于发展包容、可持续的人工智能造福人类与地球的声明》，承诺将以“开放”“包容”和“道德”的方式开发这项技术。但美国及其盟友英国拒绝签署。

【讨论纪要】

●经拜登政府到特朗普政府，因前者只谋一己私利而大损的美国中东政策正让美国国家利益持续，甚至加速“失血”

当地时间2月7日，伊朗最高领袖哈梅内伊在德黑兰纪念伊斯兰革命46周年与空军人员会面时表示与美国谈判对于解决伊朗的问题毫无作用和效果，伊朗必须正确认识这一点。伊朗不能被美国欺骗，认为只要与美国坐在谈判桌上，那一些问题就能得到解决。事实上，谈判不会解决任何问题。此外，哈梅内伊还回顾了过去伊朗与美国间的谈判。他表示，美国经常违约或撕毁协议。以伊核协议为例，该协议旨在美国解除对伊制裁，但制裁并未解除，伊朗做出了让步，但没有收到预期的效果。因此，伊朗不应该与这样的政府谈判，“谈判不明智、不聪明、不光彩”。

哈梅内伊的话讲得很重，矛头直指伊朗佩泽希齐杨政府，甚至有网络传闻，在哈梅内伊做此番演讲的时候，伊朗总统佩泽希齐杨不在现场。

在我们的观察中，伊朗的这种变化，从整体上看，对国际社会有利，这意味着伊朗的对外政策开始向相对远离伊朗当局正执行的“投降主义路线”方向摇摆。且这种新情况与当前中东局势，尤其是叙利亚局势的最新演化密切相关。

值得一提的是，如果美国在叙利亚，乃至中东的影响力迅速减弱，首先土耳其会从中获利巨大。土耳其作为欧盟力求争取从中东拉出的，摆脱美国控制之能源管线不可绕过的环节，埃尔多安政权的国际影响力将随着这条管线的开通而得到显著提升。如果欧盟（“老欧洲”）的决心足够坚决，土耳其和欧盟（“老欧洲”）正式联手只是时间问题。

尽管特朗普政府把“美军撤离叙利亚”挂在嘴边，但美国在叙利亚问题上的真实心态是欲走还留。这样一来，欧美矛盾，尤其是国家利益之间的矛盾在叙利亚问题上就会迅速凸显出来。此外，关心这条能源管线的还另有其人，比如俄罗斯。如果真的俄乌战争停战就在眼前，这条绕开俄罗斯的输欧能源管线绝不是俄罗斯希望看到的。在这个问题上，美国和俄罗斯之间或真的有“共同语言”。

●对于“老欧洲”展现出的雄心万丈，国际社会乐见

我们注意到，法国、中国、印度等61个签署方签署了巴黎人工智能宣言，共同发布《关于发展包容、可持续的人工智能造福人类与地球的声明》，承诺将以“开放”“包容”和“道德”的方式开发这项技术。但美国及其盟友英国拒绝签署共同声明。

现阶段，欧盟在积极介入叙利亚局势后续发展，这是基于传统安全层面。而在非传统安全层面，欧盟（老欧洲）正在积极介入巴黎AI行动峰会。

讽刺的是，在DeepSeek横空出世后，美国副总统万斯在巴黎的讲话仍然十分傲慢。显然，美国在这次AI峰会上被孤立，首先就是对这份傲慢的最直接反击——61个签署方签署了巴黎人工智能宣言的国家，显然没人拿美帝当回事。

得到战略策应的法国（老欧洲），转身就去和美国别苗头，美国将巴黎AI行动峰会与“星际之门”计划相提并论，恐怕这绝不是OpenAI创始人奥特曼口中所谓的“欧洲版‘星际之门’计划”。

对于“老欧洲”展现出的雄心万丈，国际社会乐见。如果说此前，“老欧洲”很难在传统安全层面，面对美国维护自身合理利益关切，那么现在，在“DeepSeek+华为”的加持下，“老欧洲”在非传统安全层面一夜之间获得了面对美国维护自身合理利益关切的能力。至此，始于2012年9月11日美国驻利比亚大使被“定点清除”的“欧美合流”，还能维持多久？

所以，某种意义上说，国际社会以AI技术及应用为切入点，先在非传统安全层面解构“欧美联盟”，再以此为基础，后再传统安全方面解构“欧美联盟”之相关进程已经正式开始。这当然也属于一种“合纵连横，远交近攻”。美国想要借助“星际之门”项目孤立中国，结果被中国“反弹了琵琶”！时间就在12月26日，这一天是毛主席的诞辰日——深刻怀念伟人。

●“星际之门”项目还没正式启动，就已经出现严重的“脱稿运行”，甚至玩不下去的明显迹象

对于当过一任美国总统的特朗普来说，对中国的真实能力，尤其是动用能力的决心是有深刻认识的。特朗普深知，未来引领世界发展的必然是中国，他更清楚，美国想要基于实力的角度出发和中国讲话正变得越来越难，尤其在美国实体制造业持续萎缩，经济愈发依赖虚拟经济和金融衍生品交易的情况下更是如此。特朗普唯一能想到的办法，或者说唯一有机会最大化利用美国平台剩余战略资源为自己所在小集团牟利的点，只能基于非传统安全层面，通过“加杠杆”的方式实现，落实到具体项目上就是“星际之门”计划。

特朗普原本的计划是，借助“技术派”的力量来启动和运作项目，其中显然并不仅仅包括“马斯克们”，尽管马斯克在“技术派”中是另类一般的存在，但特朗普作为美国总统显然不能偏用“马斯克们”，但显然，这一点，至少马斯克本人是不认可的，再加上Deepseek的强烈冲击效应，这让特朗普可能平衡新旧势力的操作空间被大幅压缩。也就是说，有可能在代言西方资本利益的美国资本利益内部就尖锐矛盾在一定程度上有所缓和的“星际之门”项目，还没正式启动，就已经出现严重的“脱稿运行”，甚至玩不下去的明显迹象，甚至，原来谈好的现在也变成了“谈不好”。于是，特朗普不得不转身更大程度上依赖马斯克，以至于2月11日，出现了特朗普与马斯克一起出现在白宫椭圆形办公室的罕见一幕。这是我们此前评估，不排除马斯克成为“美国版主父偃”之可能性的主要原因之一。

对马斯克来说，恐怕局面早已是“不进则亡”，以至于，马斯克宁可失去生命，也不愿失去生意。正所谓“生命诚可贵，‘X帝国’梦更高。若为赚钱故，两者皆可抛”！

有美国媒体爆料称，马斯克已经第17次修改遗嘱——只要消失72小时，就公布星链源代码——甚至有消息披露，马斯克的星链系统中记录了诸多西方政要、商界大佬、金融巨头们之间的绝密传输信息（包括萝莉岛事件，泽连斯基的外部账本等），俨然也是一本“百官行述”。效应上类似西方有核国家玩的所谓“核捆绑”策略。讽刺的是，有消息显示，似乎有一些人开始意识到保护马斯克安全的重要性，他们因为马斯克一旦死亡，在美国，乃至整个西方世界会掀起滔天巨浪。

●美国（特朗普政府）恐怕不能承受“北约不稳”的局面出现

对特朗普来说，由于到目前为止，没能妥善处理好对华关系（比如，在贸易战问题上，在南海问题上，在东北亚方向上等），结果导致欧盟（老欧洲）在国际社会的战略策应下疏远美国。

尽管我们说，特朗普本人随时可能“走入历史”，但不排除非常嬗变的特朗普以某种意想不到的方式迅速缓和对华关系的可能性。问题在于，如果特朗普这样做了，那又如何处理对俄关系？

值得一提的是，俄罗斯近期小动作不断，比如，俄禁止进口和在俄销售中国汕德卡SX3258卡车一事。对此，中国不会多说什么，完全可以将此类事件拿到“瓮城效应”中处理。

俄罗斯此举背后自然有“阿富汗小九九”作祟的因素，再加上特朗普政府不断就乌克兰问题向俄罗斯摇晃橄榄枝。在俄罗斯看来，一旦俄乌战争结束，俄罗斯的经济必然要从战时经济重新回归正常经济。在这一点上，俄方就被其看作支柱产业的汽车产业过度依赖中国产生新的想法。显然，俄方想通过类似动作减少俄罗斯老百姓对中国产汽车的购买意愿，为俄罗斯自己的汽车产业后续发展腾出部分市场空间。所以，俄罗斯虽然近段时间小动作不断，但如果就此断定俄罗斯打算就此机会（俄美关系缓和）和中国翻脸恐怕并不准确。或者说，俄罗斯至今在这个问题上始终是“有心无胆”。

此外，特朗普欲缓和对俄关系，除了要考虑中美关系对此影响因素外，更要考虑欧美关系对此印象。近日，荷兰议员坦言，若美国停止帮助基辅，欧盟将无法支持乌克兰。

不难看出，欧盟（老欧洲）发出的信号很明显，特朗普政府在试图与俄罗斯互动的过程中，务必考虑欧盟（老欧洲）在乌克兰问题上的感受，否则，北约不稳！

大家知道，美国全球战略的两大安全“锚点”，一个是“西太”（美军），另一个就是北约（欧洲盟友），如果北约不稳，不仅美国在西太方向很难对中国讨价还价，就算在乌克兰问题上，俄罗斯的要价也会立刻“水涨船高”！要知道，俄罗斯是不能和欧盟比的，至少欧盟有钱，有人，有市场，是美国的主要盟友。如果说，此前美国欲借助“星际之门”计划在全球范围内构建基于AI层面的“金融防火墙”，配合传统安全层面“远交近攻+合纵连横”试图继续对抗中国，围堵中国，封杀中国的话，那么现在，在“星际之门”计划被“DeepSeek+华为”模式首先瞄着美国最大的盟友——欧盟，戳了个“大窟窿”，进而丧失了非传统安全层面的战略抓手后，如果北约再现不稳，试问，以上计划岂不彻底成了废纸一张？

●友情提醒特朗普政府：讨要机票的方式错误！好处占尽，坏事做绝式的“讨要”，国际社会拒绝接受！

我们注意到马克龙拒绝特朗普将巴勒斯坦人迁出加沙提议的新闻报道。

对特朗普政府来说，其在美国中东政策上的立场就是，宁可得罪中东国家，甚至欧洲盟友，也要在巴以问题上全面支持以色列内塔尼亚胡政府，以此谋求美国国内所谓“犹太资本”之“绝对少数”的支持。在这个问题上，特朗普倒是做得“比拜登更拜登”（拜登政府在任期间，开启了在叙利亚问题上不惜损害美国国家长远利益谋私利之“潘多拉的魔盒”）！

更讽刺的是，2月11日，叙利亚过渡政府总统艾哈迈德·沙拉在10日播出的讲话中说，他认为美国总统特朗普提出的“清空加沙”并由美国接管加沙的计划“是严重的罪行，终将失败”。

显然，在中东，在叙利亚，美帝也被孤立了。中国虽然没有“上桌”，但从上桌到玩起来的整个过程哪哪儿都是中国的影子。中国手中最新的筹码就是AI技术及应用。不难想象，在法国（老欧洲）强力重返叙利亚的过程中，在叙利亚临时政府就特朗普政府的巴以问题强烈批评的背景下，恐怕俄罗斯有效重返叙利亚的心思也会活泛起来。面对这样一个美国，俄罗斯在乌克兰问题上所提条件更会动态加码！有消息说，菲律宾内部有声音要加入金砖组织。显然，柬埔寨转了一圈又只能去找中国，如此，美国在和中国谈南海问题恐怕也不会是原来的条件。如果特朗普政府无法摆平外交，又如何更好地内斗？

友情提醒特朗普政府：讨要机票的方式错误！好处占尽，坏事做绝式的“讨要”中国拒绝接受！不服？不服的结果就是，中国一手闲棋下在巴黎AI行动峰会，特朗普政府就吃不了兜着走！不难想象的是，如果有一天美军真的成为内塔尼亚胡小集团的“打手”亲自下场，和中东国家作对，和伊斯兰世界作对，和联合国作对，那么距离美国中东政策彻底崩溃恐怕就真的只有一步之遥。

【相关话题】

第7787期－血腥惨烈的美国“内斗”（3）：“阿道夫·希特勒二世”与美国版“长刀之夜”（2025-2-9）
第7789期－今天为特朗普“冲锋陷阵”的马斯克最终会落得中国古代汉武帝时期主父偃那样的结局吗？（2025-2-10）（2025-1-13）
第7794期-AI层面的合纵连横（3）：“第四轮排列组合”会否借AI被“重新激活”？（2025-2-11）（2025-1-14）

声明：具体内容如有出入，请以“东方时事解读”音频为准。

Wednesday, February 12, 2025, Issue No. 1177

Musk's 17th revision to his will includes measures such as "releasing the source code of Starlink if he disappears for 72 hours" — who is he sending a strong warning to?

[Media Coverage]

On February 12th, Musk revised his will for the 17th time. Musk revealed that if he disappears for 72 hours, a pre-set AI system will publicly release the source code of Starlink on the entire internet.

On February 12th, the two-day AI Action Summit concluded in Paris, France, on February 11th. On the closing day, 61 signatories, including France, China, India, and others, signed the Paris AI Declaration, jointly issuing the "Declaration on Developing Inclusive and Sustainable AI for the Benefit of Humanity and the Earth," committing to developing this technology in an "open," "inclusive," and "ethical" manner. However, the United States and its ally, the United Kingdom, refused to sign.

【Discussion Summary】

● From the Biden administration to the Trump administration, U.S. Middle East policies, which prioritize self-interest, continue to drain, and even accelerate the loss of, U.S. national interests.

On February 7th, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, during a meeting with air force personnel in Tehran to commemorate the 46th anniversary of the Islamic Revolution, stated that negotiations with the United States are ineffective in solving Iran's problems. Iran must recognize this. Iran should not be deceived into thinking that sitting at the negotiation table with the United States will solve any issues. In fact, negotiations will not resolve any problems. In addition, Khamenei also looked back on the past negotiations between Iran and the United States.. He said that the United States often breaches or reneges on agreements. Taking the Iran nuclear deal as an example, the agreement aimed at lifting U.S. sanctions on Iran, but the sanctions were not lifted. Iran made concessions but did not receive the expected results. Therefore, Iran should not negotiate with such a government; "negotiations are unwise, unintelligent, and dishonorable."

Khamenei's words were strongly worded, directed at the Iranian government led by Ebrahim Raisi. There were even rumors online that Raisi was not present when Khamenei made this speech.

In our observation, this change in Iran is, on the whole, beneficial to the international community, as it indicates that Iran's foreign policy is beginning to shift away from the "surrenderist line" currently being implemented by the Iranian authorities. Moreover, this new situation is closely related to the latest developments in the Middle East situation, especially in Syria.

It is worth mentioning that if U.S. influence in Syria, and even the Middle East, diminishes rapidly, Turkey will be the first to benefit significantly. As a crucial link in the energy pipeline that the EU seeks to secure from the Middle East and free from U.S. control, the international influence of the Erdoğan regime will increase significantly with the opening of this pipeline. If the EU ("Old Europe") is sufficiently determined, it is only a matter of time before Turkey and the EU ("Old Europe") formally join forces.

Although the Trump administration often talked about "withdrawing U.S. troops from Syria," the U.S. real intention regarding Syria is to stay. As a result, conflicts between Europe and the United States, especially conflicts of national interests, will quickly emerge in the Syrian issue. Additionally, others are also interested in this energy pipeline, such as Russia. If a ceasefire in the Russia-Ukraine war is imminent, this energy pipeline bypassing Russia is certainly not what Russia hopes to see. On this issue, there may indeed be "common ground" between the United States and Russia.

● The international community welcomes the ambition demonstrated by "Old Europe."

We note that 61 signatories, including France, China, India, and others, have signed the Paris AI Declaration, committing to developing AI technology in an "open," "inclusive," and "ethical" manner. However, the United States and its ally, the United Kingdom, refused to sign the joint declaration.

At present, the EU is actively involved in the subsequent developments of the Syrian situation, based on traditional security considerations. In terms of non-traditional security, the EU ("Old Europe") is actively engaging in the Paris AI Action Summit.

Ironically, even after the emergence of DeepSeek, U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris's speech in Paris remained arrogant. Clearly, the United States was isolated at this AI summit, and the most direct response to this arrogance was that 61 signatories of the Paris AI Declaration did not take the U.S. seriously.

With strategic support, France ("Old Europe") is now standing up to the United States. The United States compares the Paris AI Action Summit to the "Stargate" project, but this is certainly not the "European version of the 'Stargate' project" as described by OpenAI founder Sam Altman.

The international community welcomes the ambition demonstrated by "Old Europe." If previously, "Old Europe" found it difficult to safeguard its legitimate interests vis-à-vis the United States in terms of traditional security, then now, with the support of "DeepSeek + Huawei," "Old Europe" has overnight gained the ability to safeguard its legitimate interests vis-à-vis the United States in terms of non-traditional security. Thus, the process of deconstructing the "EU-U.S. alliance" in the non-traditional security realm, using AI technology and applications as an entry point, and then using this as a basis to deconstruct the "EU-U.S. alliance" in traditional security, has officially begun. This is also a form of "diplomatic strategy, forming alliances and dividing adversaries." The United States attempted to isolate China through the "Stargate" project, but China "turned the tables"! This happened on December 26th, the birthday of Chairman Mao – a deep tribute to the great leader.

● The "Stargate" project has not yet officially launched, but there are already significant signs of "going off script" and even indications that it may not be viable.

For Trump, who served as U.S. President, he has a deep understanding of China's true capabilities, especially China's determination to use them. Trump knows that China will inevitably lead the world's development in the future, and he is well aware that it is becoming increasingly difficult for the United States to engage with China from a position of strength, especially as the U.S. manufacturing sector continues to shrink and the economy becomes increasingly reliant on the virtual economy and financial derivatives trading. The only solution Trump can think of, or the only opportunity to maximize the use of the remaining strategic resources of the U.S. platform for the benefit of his own small group, is through the non-traditional security realm, achieved by "leveraging" – specifically, the "Stargate" project. Here's the English translation of the provided text:

Trump's original plan was to leverage the power of the "tech faction" to initiate and operate projects, which obviously included more than just "the Musks". Although Musk is a unique presence within the tech faction, as President of the United States, Trump obviously couldn't rely solely on "the Musks". However, it's clear that Musk himself didn't agree with this, coupled with the strong impact of DeepSeek, which significantly reduced Trump's room for maneuvering in balancing old and new forces. That is, the "Stargate" project, which had the potential to alleviate sharp contradictions within U.S. capital interests representing Western capital to some extent, showed serious signs of "going off script" and even becoming unviable before it even officially started. Even previously agreed-upon terms are now in disarray. As a result, Trump had to turn to rely more on Musk, leading to the rare scene on February 11th where Trump and Musk appeared together in the Oval Office of the White House. This is one of the main reasons we previously assessed that there is a possibility that Musk could become the "American version of Zhu Fu-yan".

For Musk, the situation has long been "either move forward or perish". To the point where Musk would rather lose his life than lose his business. As the saying goes, "Life is precious, but the 'X Empire' dream is loftier. For the sake of making money, one can sacrifice both!"

A U.S. media outlet revealed that Musk has revised his will for the 17th time - if he disappears for 72 hours, the source code of Starlink will be released. There are even reports disclosing that Musk's Starlink system records many confidential transmissions between Western politicians, business tycoons, and financial giants (including the Lolita Island incident, Zelenskyy's external ledgers, etc.), making it akin to a "chronicle of officials' conduct". The effect is similar to the so-called "nuclear binding" strategy employed by Western nuclear-armed countries. Ironically, there are reports suggesting that some people are starting to realize the importance of protecting Musk's safety, as his death could cause a huge uproar in the United States and even the entire Western world.

● The United States (Trump administration) cannot afford the instability of NATO.

For Trump, due to his failure to properly handle relations with China so far (such as on the issues of the trade war, the South China Sea, and the Northeast Asian direction), the EU (old Europe) has distanced itself from the United States with the strategic support of the international community.

Although we say that Trump himself may "enter history" at any time, it cannot be ruled out that the highly unpredictable Trump could rapidly ease relations with China in an unexpected way. The question is, if Trump does this, how will he handle relations with Russia?

It's worth mentioning that Russia has been making small moves recently, such as banning the import and sale of Chinese Shandeka SX3258 trucks in Russia. China won't say much about this and can fully address such incidents within the "Walled City Effect".

Behind Russia's move is undoubtedly influenced by its "Afghan calculations", coupled with the Trump administration constantly extending an olive branch to Russia regarding the Ukraine issue. In Russia's view, once the Russia-Ukraine war ends, Russia's economy will inevitably transition from a wartime economy back to a normal economy. In this regard, Russia sees its automotive industry, which it regards as a pillar industry, as overly reliant on China, leading to new ideas. Obviously, Russia wants to reduce Russian citizens' willingness to purchase Chinese-made cars through similar actions, creating some market space for the subsequent development of Russia's own automotive industry. Therefore, although Russia has been making small moves recently, it would be inaccurate to conclude that Russia intends to turn its back on China based on this opportunity (the easing of Russia-U.S. relations). Or rather, Russia has always been "willing but afraid" on this issue.

Furthermore, if Trump wants to ease relations with Russia, he must consider not only the impact of Sino-U.S. relations but also the impact on Euro-American relations. Recently, a Dutch parliamentarian frankly stated that if the United States stops helping Kyiv, the EU will be unable to support Ukraine.

It's not hard to see that the signal sent by the EU (old Europe) is clear. In the process of trying to engage with Russia, the Trump administration must consider the feelings of the EU (old Europe) on the Ukraine issue; otherwise, NATO will be unstable!

As we all know, the two major security "anchors" of U.S. global strategy are the "Western Pacific" (U.S. military) and NATO (European allies). If NATO becomes unstable, not only will it be difficult for the United States to negotiate with China in the Western Pacific direction, but Russia's demands on the Ukraine issue will also immediately "rise with the tide"! It should be noted that Russia cannot be compared to the EU, which at least has money, people, and a market, and is a major ally of the United States. If the United States previously intended to build a global "financial firewall" based on the AI level through the "Stargate" project, combined with the traditional security approach of "distant attack, near defense + diplomatic alliances" to continue confronting, besieging, and blocking China, then now, with the "Stargate" project being targeted at the EU, the United States' largest ally, by the "DeepSeek + Huawei" model, resulting in a "big hole" and subsequently losing its strategic grip on the non-traditional security level, if NATO becomes unstable again, how can the above plan not become a complete piece of waste paper?

● A friendly reminder to the Trump administration: The way to ask for a "ticket" is wrong! The international community refuses to accept the approach of taking all the benefits and doing all the bad things when "asking"!

We have noticed news reports about Macron rejecting Trump's proposal to relocate Palestinians out of Gaza.

For the Trump administration, its stance on U.S. Middle East policy is to fully support the Netanyahu government in Israel on the Palestinian-Israeli issue, even at the expense of offending Middle Eastern countries and even European allies, in order to seek the support of the so-called "absolute minority" of "Jewish capital" in the United States. On this issue, Trump has done even "more Biden than Biden" (during the Biden administration, the "Pandora's box" of seeking private interests at the expense of the United States' long-term national interests was opened on the Syrian issue)!

Even more ironically, on February 11th, Ahmed Salah, the president of the Syrian Interim Government, said in a speech broadcast on the 10th that he believed the plan proposed by U.S. President Trump to "evacuate Gaza" and have the United States take over Gaza was "a serious crime that will ultimately fail".

Obviously, in the Middle East and in Syria, the United States has also been isolated. Although China hasn't "joined the table", China's shadow can be seen throughout the entire process from joining the table to playing the game. China's latest bargaining chip is AI technology and its applications. It's not hard to imagine that in the process of France (old Europe) forcefully returning to Syria, and with the Syrian Interim Government strongly criticizing the Trump administration on the Palestinian-Israeli issue, Russia's desire to effectively return to Syria may also be revived. Faced with such a United States, Russia will dynamically increase its conditions on the Ukraine issue! There are reports that there are voices within the Philippines advocating for joining the BRICS organization. Obviously, after Cambodia went around in circles and could only turn to China again, it's unlikely that the conditions for the United States to discuss the South China Sea issue with China will be the same as before. If the Trump administration cannot manage diplomacy, how can it better engage in internal struggles?

A friendly reminder to the Trump administration: The way to ask for a "ticket" is wrong! The approach of taking all the benefits and doing all the bad things when "asking" is unacceptable to China! Don't agree? The consequence of not agreeing is that with China's casual move at the Paris AI Action Summit, the Trump administration will have to bear the consequences! It's not hard to imagine that if the U.S. military really becomes the "enforcer" of the Netanyahu faction and personally takes the field, going against Middle Eastern countries, the Islamic world, and the United Nations, then the complete collapse of U.S. Middle East policy may be just one step away.

[Related Topics]

Issue 7787 - The Bloody and Fierce "Internal Struggle" in the United States (3): "Adolf Hitler II" and the American Version of the "Night of the Long Knives" (February 9, 2025)
Issue 7789 - Will Musk, Who is Currently "Charging into Battle" for Trump, End Up Like Zhu Fu-yan in Ancient China's Han Dynasty? (February 10, 2025)
Issue 7794 - The Diplomatic Maneuvering at the AI Level (3): Will the "Fourth Round of Rearrangement and Combination" be "Reactivated" through AI? (February 11, 2025)

Disclaimer: In case of any discrepancies in the specific content, please refer to the 'Eastern Current Affairs Interpretation Audio' for the most accurate information.

原文作者公众号：

广州市贯日翻译服务有限公司为东方时评-衍射传媒/衍射咨询提供翻译支持

翻译请联系http://www.en-ch.com/chcontact.htm

手机微信13924166640

广州市越秀区环市东路世界贸易中心大厦南塔24楼 020-86266990